Note: This site's content is accessible to all versions of every browser. However, this browser may not support basic Web standards, preventing the display of our site's design details. We support the mission of the Web Standards Project in the campaign encouraging users to upgrade their browsers.

Cabinet Office |  Government House |  Policy Advisory Group |  National Assessments Bureau |  Domestic & External Security Group |  Special Units

Advanced search

About DPMC

 

Publications ~ Statement of Intent 2003-2006


OUTCOMES

 

DPMC’s overall outcome is to contribute to the achievement of “good government, with effective public service support.”

Setting and Measuring Outcomes


Many other government departments advise and support Ministers in particular areas of government business. The central agencies – Treasury, the State Services Commission and DPMC – have a special joint responsibility to exert effective leadership across the State sector. They promote the efficiency and effectiveness of the public service so that it can collectively carry out the business of government.

Agreed Outcomes

There is increasing emphasis on setting and evaluating outcomes, as outcomes are the impacts on the community of government outputs. Frequently this involves taking a whole-of-government approach to complex issues where progress will require multi-agency and integrated interventions. As part of taking a more whole-ofgovernment approach to issues, DPMC has compared its outcomes with those of the other central agencies. There are the expected similarities and work has commenced with the Treasury and the State Services Commission to develop agreed outcome statements and strategies for improving the performance of the overall public sector.


Interaction between the central agencies

The three central agencies have differing but complementary roles in developing effective outcomes for the public service as a whole. The Treasury seeks to improve the effective and efficient use of State resources and regulatory powers and to improve decision-making and performance-management systems for the State sector. It does this through its advice to the government based on its financial and economic analysis of the performance of State agencies. Whereas, the State Services Commission focuses on producing a highperforming State sector by promoting the development of senior managers and effective public-management systems in the public service.


DPMC's Place in the Machinery of Government


The 3 Branches of government


DPMC's Place in the Machinery of Government

 

DPMC services the central actors, processes and decision-making machinery of the executive
branch of government. Its key roles are:

DPMC’s emphasis is to support the decision-making processes of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. The aim is to ensure that the elected government and its administrative agencies can design and deliver policies and services that improve the lives of citizens, within a framework of stable constitutional government.

A particular point of distinction for DPMC, in comparison with the other two central agencies, is its work in ensuring that the system of Cabinet government in New Zealand operates effectively. On all issues, its aim is to bring together whatever people, agencies and information are necessary for the operation of Cabinet’s collective decision making. DPMC works at the point of intersection where separate ministers, agencies and advice streams come together at the Cabinet table.

DPMC’s work is focused on supporting in an effective way the key roles of the government. The diagram above shows DPMC’s areas of responsibility.


DPMC's Outcomes


The overall outcome that DPMC works to achieve is therefore:

Good government, with effective public service support.

This is a high-level outcome that is shared with many others – in particular, ministers and all other parts of the public service. DPMC’s role is to ensure that the Prime Minister and the Governor-General are well supported and that the decision-making machinery works well to support ministers and departments in their areas of responsibility. This requires DPMC to work with others on individual issues to ensure ministers are provided with effective public service support.


DPMC has identified four contributing outcomes that it seeks to achieve. They are:

  1. Decision making by the Prime Minister and Cabinet is well supported.
  2. The continuity of executive government within accepted conventions and practices is maintained and well supported.
  3. The Governor-General is well supported.
  4. The management of domestic and external security and other risks is well planned and co-ordinated.

These contributing outcomes overlap with each other in various ways. Some business units within DPMC contribute to several different outcomes. But the ways in which DPMC “makes a difference” can be seen from separately identifying each of these outcomes and considering how DPMC works towards them. Each is discussed in detail under the relevant contributing outcome.


Overview of the current state of the overall outcome

There are no objective overall measures of “good government” – but various indicators can provide an impression of the health of New Zealand’s political and administrative systems of government. For this Statement of Intent DPMC has chosen some readily available performance indicators, embodying wherever possible an international dimension. In the coming year, DPMC intends to further develop its reporting using these types of indicators.

Some available indicators are:

Taken together, these indicators tell a story – that the New Zealand system of Government is producing worthwhile outcomes for its citizens. The key task for DPMC is to maintain and support our political and administrative systems of government. The next two sections explain the contribution of DPMC to meeting that challenge.

 

 

‹ Previous page  Next page ›