When peer reviewing a paper in development, this electronically editable worksheet can help you assess how well it meets the four standards of quality policy advice (see Policy quality). For practical steps to improve your policy writing, see the Communication skill in the Development Pathways Tool. For more guidance on developing communication products, see Writing for Ministers and Cabinet.
Formats
Context – explains why the decision maker is getting this and where it fits#
The paper:
- explains purpose and describes context
- is clear about the priorities
- outlines previous advice and history of the issue
- sets out the connections across government.
Analysis – is logical, clearly defined, and informed by evidence#
The analysis:
- clearly defines the problem or opportunity
- is clear about the rationale for intervention
- is clear about the policy objectives
- uses relevant analytical frameworks and methodologies
- incorporates Treaty and Te Ao Māori analysis
- assesses options to make impacts clear and reveal workable solutions
- is informed by relevant research and evidence
- makes the limitations of the analysis and advice clear
- sets out the range of different views, experiences, and insights.
Advice – presents a clear position and makes a recommendation#
The advice:
- presents a clear position
- is communicated in a clear, concise, and compelling way
- is free and frank
- outlines risks and mitigations.
Actions – identifies who is doing what next#
The paper:
- sets out the next steps in the decision-making process
- enables effective implementation and delivery
- explains how the outcomes will be monitored and evaluated.