Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Back to top anchor
Home Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC)
Page url
  • Careers
  • Media
  • Contact us
  • Home
Open search Close search
  • Contact us
    • How to make an Official Information Act request
      • Tips for requesting information
      • Guidance on how we will respond
  • About DPMC
    • Who we are
    • Our work
    • Our history
    • Careers
  • Our business units
    • Cabinet Office
      • Roles and responsibilities
        • Statutory and formal responsibilities
      • Supporting the work of the Cabinet
        • Cabinet Committees
        • Elections
        • Cabinet Manual
          • Publication information
          • Foreword
          • Preface
          • Introduction
          • 1. Sovereign, Governor-General, and Executive Council
            • Introduction
            • Sovereign of New Zealand
            • Governor-General
            • Executive Council
            • Clerk of the Executive Council
            • Meetings of Executive Council
            • Gazetting and entry into force
            • Announcement
            • New Zealand Royal Honours System
            • Heraldry
            • Order of Precedence
            • Related Information
          • 2. Ministers of the Crown: Appointment, Role, and Conduct
            • Introduction
            • Prime Minister
            • Deputy Prime Minister
            • Ministers
            • Parliamentary Under-Secretaries
            • Parliamentary Private Secretaries
            • Conduct, public duty, and personal interests
            • Interactions with representatives from non-government or commercial organisations
            • Personal email accounts and phone numbers
            • Gifts and awards
            • Speaking engagements, endorsements, and non-ministerial activities
            • Government advertising and publicity guidelines
            • Ministerial travel
            • Related Information
          • 3. Ministers of the Crown and the Public Sector
            • Introduction
            • The public service and the public sector
            • Ministers and the public service
            • Ministers and Crown entities
            • Ministers and companies in the public sector
            • Integrity and conduct throughout the public sector
            • Related Information
          • 4. Ministers, the Law, and Inquiries
            • Introduction
            • Attorney-General
            • Comment by Ministers on judicial decisions
            • Crown legal business
            • Litigation involving Ministers
            • Legal advice and legal professional privilege
            • Inquiries
            • Related Information
          • 5. Cabinet Decision-making
            • Introduction
            • Cabinet
            • Cabinet committees
            • Principles of Cabinet decision-making
            • Cabinet and Cabinet committee procedures
            • Secretary of the Cabinet and the Cabinet Office
            • Related Information
          • 6. Elections, Transitions, and Government Formation
            • Introduction
            • The electoral cycle
            • Transitions following an election
            • Caretaker convention
            • Government formation
            • Mid-term transitions
            • Early election
            • Provision of information by the state sector during transitions
            • Related Information
          • 7. The Executive, Legislation, and the House
            • Introduction
            • Speech from the Throne
            • Prime Minister's statement
            • Government legislation programme
            • Revision Bills
            • Law Commission work programme
            • Development and approval of bills
            • Secondary legislation
            • Ministers and the House
            • Ministers and select committees
            • Parliamentary treaty examination
            • Crown's financial veto
            • Citizens initiated referenda
            • Declarations of inconsistency
            • Related information
          • 8. Official Information and Public Records
            • Introduction
            • Information held by government
            • Official Information Act 1982
            • Privacy Act 1993
            • Ombudsmen Act 1975
            • Providing information to select committees
            • Production or discovery of official documents
            • Requests for parliamentary information
            • Ministers and Public Records
            • Disclosure and use of official information by former Ministers
            • Convention on access to Cabinet records of a previous administration
            • Related Information
          • Appendix A: The Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi
          • Appendix B: Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor-General of New Zealand 1983
          • Index
        • History of the Cabinet Manual
      • Ministers and their portfolios
        • Ministerial List
        • Ministerial portfolios
          • Briefings to incoming ministers (BIMs)
          • Directory of Ministerial portfolios
        • Register of Assigned Legislation
        • Delegations
        • Ministers' interests
          • Ministers' Interests Jul 2025 - Dec 2025
          • Ministers' Interests Jan 2025 - Jun 2025
          • Ministers' Interests May 2024 - Dec 2024
          • Ministers' Interests 2023-2024
          • Ministers' Interests 2022-2023
          • Ministers' Interests 2021-2022
          • Ministers' interests 2020-2021
          • Ministers' Interests 2019-2020
          • Ministers' Interests 2018-2019
          • Ministers' interests 2017-2018
          • Ministers' interests 2016-2017
          • Ministers' interests 2015-2016
          • Ministers' interests 2014-2015
          • Ministers' interests 2013-2014
          • Ministers' interests 2012-2013
      • Executive Council
      • The Honours Unit
    • National Security and Resilience Group
      • National Assessments Bureau
        • Working for the National Assessments Bureau
      • National Risk and Resilience Directorate
      • National Security Policy and Coordination
      • Strategic Crisis Management Directorate
    • Policy Advisory Group
      • Roles and responsibilities
    • Delivery Unit
    • Corporate
    • Government House
  • Our programmes
    • New Zealand Royal Honours
      • Make a nomination
        • Nominations for Honours
        • New Zealand Royal Honours nomination guidelines
        • Nomination Form and Guide to making Nominations
        • Bravery Award Nominations
        • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal: Nomination Guidelines
      • Honours lists and recipients
        • Honours lists
          • Current Members of the Order of New Zealand
          • Knights and Dames of the New Zealand Order of Merit
          • Knights and Dames of the Orders of Chivalry
          • The New Zealand Gallantry Awards
          • The New Zealand Bravery Awards
          • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal
          • The Privy Council
        • Titles and styles of knights and dames
        • Wearing of insignia
          • Order of wear: orders, decorations and medals in New Zealand
          • Method of mounting insignia
      • The New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Overview of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Forfeiture of Honours
        • History
        • Components of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
          • The Order of New Zealand
          • The New Zealand Order of Merit
          • The King's Service Order
          • Gallantry and Bravery Awards
            • New Zealand Gallantry Awards
            • New Zealand Bravery Awards
          • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal
          • The New Zealand Distinguished Service Decoration
          • Other distinctive New Zealand Honours
          • "The Right Honourable"
            • The Right Honourable in New Zealand
          • "The Honourable"
            • Roll of The Honourables
          • Privy Council
        • Order of Wear
        • Rules relating to the acceptance and wearing of Foreign Honours
        • New Zealand Herald of Arms Extraordinary
      • New Zealand Royal Honours Image Gallery
      • New Zealand Royal Honours FAQs
      • Privacy and AI use statement
    • The Policy Project
      • About the Policy Project
      • Policy quality
      • Policy skills
        • Development Pathways
          • Use the tool
      • Policy capability
      • Policy Tools
        • Start Right
        • Design thinking
          • Journey mapping
          • Role play
          • Prototyping
          • Experience interviews
          • Personas
        • Behavioural insights
          • Behavioural Change Models
        • Community engagement
          • Citizen juries
        • Futures thinking
          • Horizon Scanning
          • Assumption Testing
          • Futures Wheel
          • Scenarios
          • Wind Tunnelling
          • Backcasting
        • Treaty of Waitangi analysis
      • Long-term Insights Briefings
      • Policy advice themes
        • Engagement
        • Evidence and evaluation
        • Free and frank advice
        • Innovation
        • Policy and law
        • Stewardship
      • Policy community
        • Policy system leadership
        • Policy agencies
        • Policy managers
        • Policy practitioners
        • Ways to connect to the policy community
        • Open government
      • Agency panels and quality reporting
      • Publications
      • Policy community events
    • Government Targets
      • Government Targets Quarterly Reports
    • National security
      • New Zealand's National Security Strategy
        • New Zealand’s national security community
      • National Security Intelligence Priorities
      • Counter-terrorism
        • New Zealand's Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism Strategy
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Fund
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Research
        • Terrorist and National Security Event Media Protocols
      • Countering foreign interference
      • Critical Infrastructure
        • Critical Infrastructure Resilience
      • Cyber Security Strategy
        • Cyber ransom advice
        • United Nations Cybercrime Treaty
          • We asked, you said, we did
      • Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • 2022 Review of the Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • Why did we need new legislation?
        • What is intelligence?
        • Defining national security
        • Bringing the agencies further into the public service
        • Powers and warrants
          • Activities allowed under intelligence warrants
          • The authorisation framework
          • Protections for New Zealanders
        • Strengthening oversight of NZSIS and GCSB
        • Whistleblowing and protecting classified information
        • Cover and immunities
          • Cover and assumed identity arrangements
          • Immunities from legal liabilities
        • Sharing information
          • Domestic information sharing
          • Arrangements with foreign partners
        • The National Assessments Bureau
        • Case studies
          • Counter-terrorism
          • Investigating a suspected terrorist
          • Counter-espionage
          • Cyber security in action
        • Resources
      • Strengthening resilience to disinformation
        • Multi-Stakeholder Group to strengthen resilience to disinformation
        • Fund for community-based initiatives to strengthen Aotearoa’s resilience to disinformation
        • Public Research and Insights into Disinformation
      • National Security Long-term Insights Briefing
        • LTIB Topic Consultation Summary
      • Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain
        • The Government’s Response
        • Working with Communities - get involved
          • Kāpuia - Ministerial Advisory Group Nominations
        • Response Steering Group
        • Response Progress
        • Measuring Success
        • Improving Community Engagement
        • Key Documents
        • Get in touch
      • Five Country Ministerial
    • Other work
      • Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor
        • Meet Dr John Roche, Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor
        • Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor archives
          • Archive
            • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2009-2011
            • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2011-2013
            • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2013-2015
            • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2015-2018
            • Professor Dame Juliet Gerrard 2018-2021
            • Professor Dame Juliet Gerrard 2021-2024
      • Chief Science Advisor Forum
      • Severe Weather Events Recovery Review Panel releases
      • Historical Programmes
        • NEMA
        • Cyclone Recovery Unit
          • Cyclone Recovery Funds and Schemes for people in Affected Regions
          • Publicly released Cyclone Recovery-related documents
        • He Whenua Taurikura
          • He Whenua Taurikura Hui
            • He Whenua Taurikura Hui 2021
            • He Whenua Taurikura Hui 2022
          • Master’s Scholarship
            • Master's Scholarship 2021/2022
            • Master's Scholarship FAQs
          • He Whenua Taurikura Co-Directors
        • Greater Christchurch recovery and regeneration
          • Greater Christchurch Group
            • Roles and responsibilities
              • Disestablishment of CERA
            • External websites
          • The Greater Christchurch Regeneration Act 2016
          • Our regeneration partners
          • Global Settlement Agreement with Christchurch City Council
          • Recovery and regeneration plans
            • Cranford Regeneration Plan
            • Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Regeneration Plan
            • Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan
            • Residential Red Zone Offer Recovery Plan
            • Land Use Recovery Plan
            • Christchurch Central Recovery Plan
          • Section 71 proposals
            • Commercial film or video production facilities in Christchurch – Section 71 Proposal
            • Hagley Oval
            • Lyttelton Commercial Zone Parking
            • Yaldhurst Recreation and Sports Facility
            • Residential Unit Overlay District Plan Changes
            • Redcliffs School relocation
          • Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Project
          • Past Orders in Council
        • COVID-19 Proactive Releases
        • Kāpuia – Ministerial Advisory Group
          • Advice from Kāpuia
          • Kāpuia feedback to agencies
          • Kāpuia Pānui
        • All of Government COVID-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry
        • Child Wellbeing and Poverty Reduction
          • Child Wellbeing and Poverty Reduction Group
          • Child and youth wellbeing strategy
            • Publications and resources
          • Reducing child poverty
            • Formal gazetting of targets for reducing child poverty
        • COVID-19 Group
        • Health Transition Unit
        • Implementation Unit
          • Latest news and updates
        • Inquiry into the EQC
        • Connect Smart
        • Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Learning and Legacy Programme
        • Ministerial Committee on Poverty
        • Flag consideration project
        • Christ Church Cathedral Working Group
        • Tackling methamphetamine
        • CERA website archive
          • CERA corporate information
          • CERA legislation
          • CERA media releases 2011
          • CERA media releases 2012
          • CERA media releases 2013
          • CERA media releases 2014
          • CERA media releases 2015
          • CERA media releases 2016
          • CERA official information
          • CERA public information
          • CERA publications and reports
          • CERA websites
    • Risk and resilience
      • National Risk and Resilience Framework
        • New Zealand's National Risks
        • 2024 National Risks Public Survey Report
        • 2023 National Security Survey Report
        • 2022 National Security Survey Report
      • Building Resilience to Hazards Long-term Insights Briefing
      • New Zealand’s strategic crisis response arrangements
        • The ODESC System during a crisis
  • Publications
  • Browse all sections
  • Publications
  • News and notices
  • Annual reports
  • CabGuide
  • Cabinet Manual
  • Contact us
    • How to make an Official Information Act request
      • Tips for requesting information
      • Guidance on how we will respond
  • About DPMC
    • Who we are
    • Our work
    • Our history
    • Careers
  • Our business units
    • Cabinet Office
      • Roles and responsibilities
        • Statutory and formal responsibilities
      • Supporting the work of the Cabinet
        • Cabinet Committees
        • Elections
        • Cabinet Manual
        • History of the Cabinet Manual
      • Ministers and their portfolios
        • Ministerial List
        • Ministerial portfolios
        • Register of Assigned Legislation
        • Delegations
        • Ministers' interests
      • Executive Council
      • The Honours Unit
    • National Security and Resilience Group
      • National Assessments Bureau
        • Working for the National Assessments Bureau
      • National Risk and Resilience Directorate
      • National Security Policy and Coordination
      • Strategic Crisis Management Directorate
    • Policy Advisory Group
      • Roles and responsibilities
    • Delivery Unit
    • Corporate
    • Government House
  • Our programmes
    • New Zealand Royal Honours
      • Make a nomination
        • Nominations for Honours
        • New Zealand Royal Honours nomination guidelines
        • Nomination Form and Guide to making Nominations
        • Bravery Award Nominations
        • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal: Nomination Guidelines
      • Honours lists and recipients
        • Honours lists
        • Titles and styles of knights and dames
        • Wearing of insignia
      • The New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Overview of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Forfeiture of Honours
        • History
        • Components of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Order of Wear
        • Rules relating to the acceptance and wearing of Foreign Honours
        • New Zealand Herald of Arms Extraordinary
      • New Zealand Royal Honours Image Gallery
      • New Zealand Royal Honours FAQs
      • Privacy and AI use statement
    • The Policy Project
      • About the Policy Project
      • Policy quality
      • Policy skills
        • Development Pathways
      • Policy capability
      • Policy Tools
        • Start Right
        • Design thinking
        • Behavioural insights
        • Community engagement
        • Futures thinking
        • Treaty of Waitangi analysis
      • Long-term Insights Briefings
      • Policy advice themes
        • Engagement
        • Evidence and evaluation
        • Free and frank advice
        • Innovation
        • Policy and law
        • Stewardship
      • Policy community
        • Policy system leadership
        • Policy agencies
        • Policy managers
        • Policy practitioners
        • Ways to connect to the policy community
        • Open government
      • Agency panels and quality reporting
      • Publications
      • Policy community events
    • Government Targets
      • Government Targets Quarterly Reports
    • National security
      • New Zealand's National Security Strategy
        • New Zealand’s national security community
      • National Security Intelligence Priorities
      • Counter-terrorism
        • New Zealand's Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism Strategy
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Fund
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Research
        • Terrorist and National Security Event Media Protocols
      • Countering foreign interference
      • Critical Infrastructure
        • Critical Infrastructure Resilience
      • Cyber Security Strategy
        • Cyber ransom advice
        • United Nations Cybercrime Treaty
      • Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • 2022 Review of the Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • Why did we need new legislation?
        • What is intelligence?
        • Defining national security
        • Bringing the agencies further into the public service
        • Powers and warrants
        • Strengthening oversight of NZSIS and GCSB
        • Whistleblowing and protecting classified information
        • Cover and immunities
        • Sharing information
        • The National Assessments Bureau
        • Case studies
        • Resources
      • Strengthening resilience to disinformation
        • Multi-Stakeholder Group to strengthen resilience to disinformation
        • Fund for community-based initiatives to strengthen Aotearoa’s resilience to disinformation
        • Public Research and Insights into Disinformation
      • National Security Long-term Insights Briefing
        • LTIB Topic Consultation Summary
      • Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain
        • The Government’s Response
        • Working with Communities - get involved
        • Response Steering Group
        • Response Progress
        • Measuring Success
        • Improving Community Engagement
        • Key Documents
        • Get in touch
      • Five Country Ministerial
    • Other work
      • Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor
        • Meet Dr John Roche, Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor
        • Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor archives
      • Chief Science Advisor Forum
      • Severe Weather Events Recovery Review Panel releases
      • Historical Programmes
        • NEMA
        • Cyclone Recovery Unit
        • He Whenua Taurikura
        • Greater Christchurch recovery and regeneration
        • COVID-19 Proactive Releases
        • Kāpuia – Ministerial Advisory Group
        • All of Government COVID-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry
        • Child Wellbeing and Poverty Reduction
        • COVID-19 Group
        • Health Transition Unit
        • Implementation Unit
        • Inquiry into the EQC
        • Connect Smart
        • Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Learning and Legacy Programme
        • Ministerial Committee on Poverty
        • Flag consideration project
        • Christ Church Cathedral Working Group
        • Tackling methamphetamine
        • CERA website archive
    • Risk and resilience
      • National Risk and Resilience Framework
        • New Zealand's National Risks
        • 2024 National Risks Public Survey Report
        • 2023 National Security Survey Report
        • 2022 National Security Survey Report
      • Building Resilience to Hazards Long-term Insights Briefing
      • New Zealand’s strategic crisis response arrangements
        • The ODESC System during a crisis
  • Publications
  • Browse all sections
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. DPMC Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Plan 2024/25
Corporate document

DPMC Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Plan 2024/25

Publication type:
Corporate document
Published by:
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC)
Issue status:
Superseded
Issue date:
Monday, 14 October 2024
Additional details
Publication category:
Corporate documents
Last updated:
Wednesday, 23 October 2024
Copyright:
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Formats
  • DPMC Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Plan 2024/25
    pdf
    320.93 KB

Organisation overview, context and commitment - Tā te whakahaere matawhānui, manawanui hoki #

The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) advances an ambitious, resilient and well-governed Aotearoa New Zealand. To achieve this we require an influential, agile, high-performing organisation in which our people feel empowered, valued and engaged.

We want our workforce (ohu mahi) to reflect the diversity of Aotearoa New Zealand. Every person needs to be curious, resilient, self-aware and culturally competent, so we can engage redspectfully with our diverse local and global communities of interest. The way in which we work needs to value the diversity of people, thought, approach and experience. Being inclusive in how we engage with one another means our people feel they belong both to our community and many others, they can be themselves at work, speak up safely and contribute.

Our aspiration for our staff (kaimahi) is that they:

  • hear conversations that embrace and value difference, and focus on how we can make equitable change and positive difference for all people in New Zealand
  • feel a strengthened sense of inclusion, where we can all bring our best and true self to work
  • experience environments and leaders fostering and modelling a more diverse and inclusive culture with words, actions, systems and processes
  • understand a variety of world views and how that impacts our mahi, and
  • see a workforce that is more diverse, and more reflective of the population.

All business units have shared internal priorities that focus on:

  • building our te ao Māori capability, and
  • foster a positive and inclusive work environment (wāhi mahi).

We actively support our employee-led networks and provide access to wider public service networks.

We have developed our approach to our diversity and inclusion goals over the past three years, with our employee-led networks, staff workshops, all-staff and people leaders' hui, and a meeting with the Executive Leadership Team.

Our intentions to deliver on Diversity and Inclusion, Kia Toipoto and Papa Pounamu commitments are included in this plan.

Our people #

We're a small to medium-sized organisation of 242 people supporting the Prime Minister, the Governor-General and Cabinet as well as the work of our other portfolio ministers.

Gender and leadership

Women make up the majority of our workforce and occupy 67% of all people leader roles (33 of 49) and 72% of Tiers 2 and 3 roles. DPMC's Executive Leadership Team (ELT) is comprised of seven members, including four women and three men[1].

Table 1: Gender by percentage[2]

Gender All DPMC %
Women 67.4
Male 31.0

Table 2: Gender balanced leadership

Table 2: Gender balanced leadership
Notes
  1. [1] Including secondees-in and the Chief Executive, both excluded from Table 2.
  2. [2] As shown here, a small subset of our employees has not stated a gender or identified as another gender; in the interests of privacy, we have not included them in our analysis other than where gender is not a factor.

Pay Gaps #

Our Gender Pay Gap (GPG) has improved #

Our data shows our GPG improved between June 2022 and June 2024. The steady fluctuation of staff, with 86 employees onboarded and 89 offboarded in the 12 months to 30 June 2024, contributed to our GPG movement.

Our gender pay gap improved by 4.1 percentage points over the final quarter of reporting to 30 June 2024. This was due to a number of senior male staff exiting DPMC and a number of senior female staff joining. GPG for permanent staff improved from 16% to 9.1% in the last year.

Table 3: Gender Pay Gap June 2024

GPG Mean: 9.9%               |               GPG Median: 19.7%

Table 4: Gender Pay Gap June 2022 to June 2024

Table 4: Gender Pay Gap June 2022 to June 2024

Terms used in this plan #

Horizontal equity - this is how we compare all people in the same pay band by gender or by ethnicity. For example, if there is no significant difference between the average salary of men and women within a band, we have achieved horizontal equity for that band. If we achieved horizontal equity across all pay bands, then the organisation as a whole has achieved horizontal equity. Typically, this is more immediately controllable by an organisation as equity adjustments can be applied to salaries as part of remuneration rounds.

Vertical equity - this is how we compare all people across all pay bands by gender or by ethnicity. For example, if there is no significant difference between the average salary of men and women across all salaries then the organisation as a whole has achieved vertical equity. Typically, this is more difficult to make changes in where there is a wide range of roles within an organisation, including of lower-paid roles that typically recruit women into. The lower level of pay for certain roles within an organisation to some extent reflects wider societal attitudes and expectations as to appropriate levels of remuneration for such work.

Mean, or 'average' salary - this is the method of comparison used by the Public Service Commission. It is a simple arithmetic value of the total salaries paid to men, divided by the number of men, compared with the total salaries paid to women, divided by the number of women.

Median salary - this is the method of comparison used by Statistics New Zealand. It involves listing all salaries for men from top to bottom and picking the middle number, and comparing this with the middle number of all salaries for all women listed from top to bottom.

This matters to us: Our mean gender pay gap recently reduced below ten percent for the first time since Kia Toipoto, the Public Service pay gaps action plan, launched in November 2021. Our goal for this year is to ensure our mean gender pay gap remains below ten percent. 

Variation in our size and composition affects pay equity #

We experience a variation in the size and make-up of our workforce with new time-limited responsibilities arriving such as hosting the initial COVID-19 response function, and the functional Chief Executive, Cyclone Recovery, and others exiting such as the COVID-19 Response Group, Health Transition Unit, and the Christchurch Call. This means we typically have a higher proportion fixed-term staff than in other public service agencies. As of 30 June 2024, a quarter of our people are on fixed-term contracts.

Table 5: Employees by employment type

Employment Type Employees Percentage
Permanent 181 74.8
Fixed-term 61 25.2

We have analysed our gender pay gap by employment type and there is a significant difference of ten percentage points between the GPG for our permanent staff and that for fixed-term staff. This is a consequence of two ELT members currently employed on fixed terms. Removing ELT from the data in Table 6 below reduces the fixed-term GPG to 5.2 percent.

Table 6: Gender Pay Gap by employee type June 2024

Employee Type Mean Total Remuneration             
Female $ Male $ % Gap
Permanent 129,998 142,985 9.1
Fixed Term 148,224 183,134 19.1
Total 135,030 149,944 9.9

Our horizontal equity looks good but we face a vertical equity challenge #

When we compare the salaries of women and men in the same grade, we do not see a pay gap issue. In all grades, the ‘horizontal' GPG for permanent staff, is either positive or small (below 5.62% with differences explainable). This is shown below:

Table 7: Mean total remuneration by pay grade and gender (permanent staff)

Table 7: Mean total remuneration by pay grade and gender (permanent staff)

The 'vertical' challenge for DPMC is that we have more women in grades 17 and below. We think that's a positive sign for policy and advisory level grades that have a clear career pathway (15-17) as our promotion process applies.

Table 8: Employees by grade and gender and type June 2024

Table 8: Employees by grade and gender and type June 2024

This matters to us: An area of focus is to review our recruitment processes to check our practices for biases.

We have more work to do on diversity #

Our people are mostly European/Pākehā. Our small size means it is difficult to obtain datasets of sufficient size to conduct analysis by ethnicity. Nine out of ten staff have identified the ethnicities with which they identify and we regularly invite our people to update their ethnicity information. People may identify with multiple ethnicities, so the percentages shown below can add up to more than 100 percent.

The proportion of our staff identifying with ethnicities other than European/Pākehā is less than their representation in the workforce as a whole (table 9).

Table 9: Ethnicities disclosed and total disclosure

Ethnicity All DPMC %
Disclosure rate 90.9
Ethnicities disclosed
European 85.9
Māori 7.7
Asian 8.2
Pacific 3.2
Middle Eastern/Latin American/African 1.4
Other 1.4

Attracting appropriate candidates and growing the skillsets internally are key to making this shift. There is slow improvement with the number of staff identifying with a non-dominant ethnicity. We use more channels and tools to support more diverse appointment processes and outcomes. Attraction of ethnically diverse applicants has been slightly more successful, although our data shows that this does not always flow through to hire.

And reducing our Ethnic Pay Gap #

Non-dominant ethnic groups have a low representation in DPMC with average salaries for some ethnic groups being less than others. The numbers are too small to create robust measures of ethnic pay gaps for each group.

We have instead calculated a pay gap between all Māori, Pacific, Asian and Middle Eastern/Latin American/African (MELAA) employees and European/Pākehā employees. This sits at 16%. This is largely driven by grade distribution (a ‘vertical' issue), with only a small number of our ethnic employees being in higher grades.

Setting a target for closing our ethnic pay gap is challenging due to the very small numbers involved meaning a shift in just one or two employees can have a significant positive or negative effect. Our approach is to focus on increasing the proportion of people in our grades 15-17, where our promotion process applies. This will assist in increasing the pipeline for future leadership roles which will have the most impact on vertical equity.

Why diversity, equity, and inclusion matters #

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is about reflecting and valuing the communities that DPMC engages with, to advance an ambitious, resilient and well-governed Aotearoa New Zealand.

When we attract, retain, recognise, value, and develop the skills and experiences of people across all dimensions of diversity (e.g. gender, ethnicity, disability, faith, rainbow, neurodiversity, age), this enhances our policies, engagement, leadership, and workplace.

This matters to us: Improving ethnic representation in our workforce and in leadership has been a focus in recent years and over the next five years we will aim to improve our Māori staff representation to at least 12.8%, the level of the Māori population in Wellington where we are based (Census 2021) - a rate of 1 percentage point per annum. There are continuing questions as to whether we are attracting a wider diversity of applicants or whether there are biases in the recruitment processes. Understanding this is an area of focus. Improving our ethnicity disclosure rate to 95% will be a target. We will explore the ethnic diversity in our grades 15-17 and establish targets for improving this.

Employee engagement participation is high #

Our annual Kōrero Mai employee results conducted in March 2024 recorded 83% participation by our people, including secondees from other agencies working with us. Of the 233 respondents:

  • 18 people identified as being disabled
  • 23 people identified as LGBTTQIA+
  • 13 people identified as other than NZ European/Pākehā.

Aside from gender, the sample sizes are not large enough to draw conclusions around the experience of staff in these groups.

Overall experiences of women and men appear similar. However, men report less agreement with remuneration being appropriate to the market and are less confident than women that people leaders will implement our purpose, strategic objectives and values successfully.

And our employee-led networks have grown #

We have six employee-led networks, supported by our Culture and Engagement network.

Women's Network to support, connect and empower women across the Department.

Interfaith Network to create safe and inclusive spaces for staff from a range of diverse faith communities to bring their whole selves to work and help build understanding about faith communities and practices.

Parents' Network to support parents to connect, support each other, and to advocate to be the best parent-friendly workplace we can be.

Rainbow Network focussed on creating a safe, inclusive and supportive space for staff who identify as part of the Rainbow community and our allies.

New Professionals' Network to support and connect professionals across the Department where people can engage with people on similar journeys and develop and grow together.

Tai Ora Climate Change and Sustainability Network to support our emissions-reduction and sustainability journey, in strategy and practice.

In addition, we have a Waiata group which meets weekly, and informal social networks.

We promote wider public service networks which our people can attend, particularly in areas where we do not have sufficient staff to establish or maintain our own.

This matters to us: Fostering an inclusive culture enables our people to feel valued, empowered and engaged so that DPMC can achieve its goal of being an influential, agile and high-performing organisation.

Progress to date and future plans - Pae tata, pae tawhiti #

Action area Progress to date Planned priority actions 2025 Success indicators
Ensure our mean gender pay gap remains below ten percent.

In recent years, we've been working to ensure that all our core HR processes (e.g. recruitment, development, promotion, remuneration) support equal opportunity for women and men and do not include any biases. We have also been working on building an inclusive culture. For example:

  • We actively look at gender inequities at recruitment and in our annual remuneration round where we actively identify and address inequities.
  • Our annual promotion processes use the same transparent approach based on the Public Service Commission guidance. The promotion process is communicated on the intranet including explicit messaging on key opportunities e.g. promotion is available for fulltime and part-time staff, permanent and fixed-term staff.
  • We support people leaders with resources and advice to have quality conversations with their people and ensure everyone has a good development and career plan in place.
  • All HR policies, remuneration information and resources, including salary bands, are available in the intranet.
  • We offer flexible-work-by-default which, amongst other things, assists those with dependant responsibilities to maintain their active commitments and balance work and home life without affecting career development and promotion - areas that historically disadvantaged women. It also supports those from neurodiverse groups to create an environment that supports their working style.

Launch learning journey overview to make career progression transparent for our aspiring and new leaders.

Continue to include a specific focus on gender inequities in our annual remuneration round and at recruitment.

Reinstate our talent management process to ensure that our talent is equitably identified and development opportunities linked to this.

Track mean gender pay gap quarterly (all employees).

Continue to run a transparent promotion process annually.

40:40:20 leadership balance

Our gender pay gap remains below ten percent

Our horizontal gender pay gap (by grade/same and similar roles) for our permanent employees will remain low and any gaps are explainable.

Review our recruitment processes, to check our practices for biases.

Human Resources policies are in an ongoing review cycle and include opportunities for staff to comment. Our policies and processes align with the Public Service Commission guidance.

90-day survey.

Review our recruitment practices and implement changes to ensure we are attracting and enabling diversity and demonstrating inclusive behaviours, for example: vacancy pages, interview practices, targeted attraction techniques. No appointment reviews are upheld on the basis of bias in the appointment process.
Reduce the Ethnic Pay Gap between European/Pākehā and ‘all other' ethnic groups. Now that we have ethnicity data for 90% of staff, we've been able to develop an ethnic pay gap between European/Pākehā staff and all other ethnicities.

We propose to review the ethnicity data for our Grades 15-17, and to develop a target to improve ethnic representation. Over time, this will improve our ethnic leadership profile. We will take care to ensure this is not at the expense of our intention to maintain an increasing number of women within these grades.

Look at ethnic inequities in our annual remuneration round and at recruitment.

Increased representation of non-dominant ethnic groups in grades 15-17.
Improving our ethnicity disclosure rate to 95%. Our focus on encouraging staff to include their ethnicity in the data we collect means that we now have data for 90% of staff.

Continue to promote benefit of providing demographic data quarterly.

Track disclosure rate quarterly.

Ethnicity disclosure rate improves.

Understand and address the question of whether we are attracting a wider diversity of applicants or whether there are biases in the recruitment processes.

 

Bias training is offered to all staff and required for people on recruitment panels.

Cultural competence (te ao Māori, and diversity and inclusion) is a core, ongoing part of our workforce development.

Policy and guidelines for recruitment are refreshed to ensure we attract a diverse range of applicants. We will explore factors that influence retention and career development to maintain diversity.

Job recruitment advertisements clearly explain the flexible working by default policy principles.

Encourage all people leaders to complete unconscious bias training.

Track and report on recruitment outcomes based on gender and ethnicity (where sufficient data is available).

We understand whether there is bias in our recruitment process and have plans to address and have effective retention and development practices.
Improve our Māori staff representation to at least 12.8%, the level of the Māori population in Wellington where we are based (Census 2021) over five years. Implementing, monitoring and reporting on our action plans; diversity and inclusion, Whāinga Amorangi, te reo Māori.

Implement the Māori recruitment process being developed by Public Service Commission.

Track Māori recruitment data quarterly, having calculated how many positions 1 percentage point per annum equates to, and having regard to our intention to increase the representation of non-dominant ethnicities in grades 15-17.

More Māori apply for and are appointed to roles at the rate of one percentage point per annum.
Foster an inclusive culture.

Inclusive language guide.

Mana Āki cultural competency programme.

Te Rito te ao Māori capability programme.

Implement pulse surveys.

Implement an ‘Acceptable behaviours & positive mindsets' programme.

Relaunch and promote Mana Āki refresh programme.

Relaunch and promote Te Rito programme.

People score improves.

Staff sentiment increases for the question: DPMC is a great place to work.

Increased percentage of staff who report ‘never' to the question: How often do you feel unjustly criticised, bullied or shown up in front of others by your colleagues or your manager/leader?

  • Previous
  • Next
Sidebar anchor
View all on one page
Show content paged
Print this publication

Table of Contents

  1. Organisation overview, context and commitment - Tā te whakahaere matawhānui, manawanui hoki
    1. Our people
  2. Pay Gaps
    1. Our Gender Pay Gap (GPG) has improved
    2. Terms used in this plan
    3. Variation in our size and composition affects pay equity
    4. Our horizontal equity looks good but we face a vertical equity challenge
    5. We have more work to do on diversity
    6. And reducing our Ethnic Pay Gap
    7. Why diversity, equity, and inclusion matters
    8. Employee engagement participation is high
    9. And our employee-led networks have grown
  3. Progress to date and future plans - Pae tata, pae tawhiti

Related publications

DPMC Corporate Policy: Procurement Policy

Corporate document
5 May 2026

DPMC Strategic Intentions 2025/26 to 2029/30

Corporate document
24 Feb 2026

Annual Report 2025

Corporate document
21 Oct 2025

DPMC Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Plan 2025/26

Corporate document
2 Oct 2025

Seventh Annual Report on the Operation of the Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Act 2017

Corporate document
5 Dec 2024

Annual Report 2024

Corporate document
15 Oct 2024
View all publications

Content wrapper

Help us improve DPMC

Your feedback is very important in helping us improve the DPMC website.


More menu anchor
Home Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC)
Page url

Toitū carbon reduce ISO 14064-1 organisation

Back to top

About DPMC
  • Who we are
  • Our work
  • Our history
  • Careers
Our business units
  • Cabinet Office
  • National Security and Resilience Group
  • Policy Advisory Group
  • Delivery Unit
  • Corporate
  • Government House
Our programmes
  • New Zealand Royal Honours
  • The Policy Project
  • Government Targets
  • National security
  • Other work
  • Risk and resilience
Publications
  • Publications
  • News and notices
  • Annual reports
  • CabGuide
  • Cabinet Manual
  • Contact us
  • Copyright and licensing
  • Privacy
  • About this site
  • Disclaimer
  • Site map

© Copyright Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

New Zealand Government