Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Back to top anchor
Home Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC)
Page url
  • Events
  • Media
  • Contact us
  • Home
Open search Close search
  • Contact us
    • How to make an Official Information Act request
      • Tips for requesting information
      • Guidance on how we will respond
  • About DPMC
    • Who we are
    • Our work
    • Our history
    • Careers
  • Our business units
    • Cabinet Office
      • Roles and responsibilities
        • Statutory and formal responsibilities
      • Supporting the work of the Cabinet
        • Cabinet Committees
        • Elections
        • Cabinet Manual
          • Publication information
          • Foreword
          • Preface
          • Introduction
          • 1. Sovereign, Governor-General, and Executive Council
            • Introduction
            • Sovereign of New Zealand
            • Governor-General
            • Executive Council
            • Clerk of the Executive Council
            • Meetings of Executive Council
            • Gazetting and entry into force
            • Announcement
            • New Zealand Royal Honours System
            • Heraldry
            • Order of Precedence
            • Related Information
          • 2. Ministers of the Crown: Appointment, Role, and Conduct
            • Introduction
            • Prime Minister
            • Deputy Prime Minister
            • Ministers
            • Parliamentary Under-Secretaries
            • Parliamentary Private Secretaries
            • Conduct, public duty, and personal interests
            • Interactions with representatives from non-government or commercial organisations
            • Personal email accounts and phone numbers
            • Gifts and awards
            • Speaking engagements, endorsements, and non-ministerial activities
            • Government advertising and publicity guidelines
            • Ministerial travel
            • Related Information
          • 3. Ministers of the Crown and the Public Sector
            • Introduction
            • The public service and the public sector
            • Ministers and the public service
            • Ministers and Crown entities
            • Ministers and companies in the public sector
            • Integrity and conduct throughout the public sector
            • Related Information
          • 4. Ministers, the Law, and Inquiries
            • Introduction
            • Attorney-General
            • Comment by Ministers on judicial decisions
            • Crown legal business
            • Litigation involving Ministers
            • Legal advice and legal professional privilege
            • Inquiries
            • Related Information
          • 5. Cabinet Decision-making
            • Introduction
            • Cabinet
            • Cabinet committees
            • Principles of Cabinet decision-making
            • Cabinet and Cabinet committee procedures
            • Secretary of the Cabinet and the Cabinet Office
            • Related Information
          • 6. Elections, Transitions, and Government Formation
            • Introduction
            • The electoral cycle
            • Transitions following an election
            • Caretaker convention
            • Government formation
            • Mid-term transitions
            • Early election
            • Provision of information by the state sector during transitions
            • Related Information
          • 7. The Executive, Legislation, and the House
            • Introduction
            • Speech from the Throne
            • Prime Minister's statement
            • Government legislation programme
            • Revision Bills
            • Law Commission work programme
            • Development and approval of bills
            • Secondary legislation
            • Ministers and the House
            • Ministers and select committees
            • Parliamentary treaty examination
            • Crown's financial veto
            • Citizens initiated referenda
            • Declarations of inconsistency
            • Related information
            • Related information
          • 8. Official Information and Public Records
            • Introduction
            • Information held by government
            • Official Information Act 1982
            • Privacy Act 1993
            • Ombudsmen Act 1975
            • Providing information to select committees
            • Production or discovery of official documents
            • Requests for parliamentary information
            • Ministers and Public Records
            • Disclosure and use of official information by former Ministers
            • Convention on access to Cabinet records of a previous administration
            • Related Information
          • Appendix A: The Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi
          • Appendix B: Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor-General of New Zealand 1983
          • Index
        • History of the Cabinet Manual
      • Ministers and their portfolios
        • Ministerial List
        • Ministerial portfolios
          • Briefings to incoming ministers (BIMs)
          • Directory of Ministerial portfolios
        • Register of Assigned Legislation
        • Delegations
        • Ministers' interests
          • Ministers' Interests May 2024 - Dec 2024
          • Ministers' Interests 2023-2024
          • Ministers' Interests 2022-2023
          • Ministers' Interests 2021-2022
          • Ministers' interests 2020-2021
          • Ministers' Interests 2019-2020
          • Ministers' Interests 2018-2019
          • Ministers' interests 2017-2018
          • Ministers' interests 2016-2017
          • Ministers' interests 2015-2016
          • Ministers' interests 2014-2015
          • Ministers' interests 2013-2014
          • Ministers' interests 2012-2013
      • Executive Council
      • The Honours Unit
    • National Security Group
      • National Assessments Bureau
        • Working for the National Assessments Bureau
      • National Security Policy
        • National Cyber Policy Office
    • Risk and Systems Governance Group
      • Strategic Crisis Management Unit
      • National Risk Directorate
      • Governance Directorate
      • Joint Office
    • Policy Advisory Group
      • Roles and responsibilities
    • Delivery Unit
    • Strategy, Governance and Engagement Group
    • Government House
    • Cyclone Recovery Unit
      • Cyclone Recovery Funds and Schemes for people in Affected Regions
      • Publicly released Cyclone Recovery-related documents
  • Departmental agency
    • NEMA
  • Our programmes
    • New Zealand Royal Honours
      • Make a nomination
        • Nominations for Honours
        • New Zealand Royal Honours nomination guidelines
        • Nomination Form and Guide to making Nominations
        • Bravery Award Nominations
        • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal: Nomination Guidelines
      • Honours lists and recipients
        • Honours lists
          • Current Members of the Order of New Zealand
          • Knights and Dames of the New Zealand Order of Merit
          • Knights and Dames of the Orders of Chivalry
          • The New Zealand Gallantry Awards
          • The New Zealand Bravery Awards
          • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal
          • The Privy Council
        • Titles and styles of knights and dames
        • Wearing of insignia
          • Order of wear: orders, decorations and medals in New Zealand
          • Method of mounting insignia
      • The New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Overview of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Forfeiture of Honours
        • History
        • Components of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
          • The Order of New Zealand
          • The New Zealand Order of Merit
          • The King's Service Order
          • Gallantry and Bravery Awards
            • New Zealand Gallantry Awards
            • New Zealand Bravery Awards
          • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal
          • The New Zealand Distinguished Service Decoration
          • Other distinctive New Zealand Honours
          • "The Right Honourable"
            • The Right Honourable in New Zealand
          • "The Honourable"
            • Roll of The Honourables
          • Privy Council
        • Order of Wear
        • Rules relating to the acceptance and wearing of Foreign Honours
        • New Zealand Herald of Arms Extraordinary
      • New Zealand Royal Honours Image Gallery
      • New Zealand Royal Honours FAQs
      • Privacy statement
    • The Policy Project
      • About the Policy Project
      • Policy quality
      • Policy skills
        • Development Pathways
          • Use the tool
      • Policy capability
      • Policy Methods Toolbox
        • Start Right
        • Design thinking
          • Journey mapping
          • Role play
          • Prototyping
          • Experience interviews
          • Personas
        • Behavioural insights
          • Behavioural Change Models
        • Community engagement
          • Citizen juries
        • Futures thinking
          • Horizon Scanning
          • Assumption Testing
          • Futures Wheel
          • Scenarios
          • Wind Tunnelling
          • Backcasting
        • Treaty of Waitangi analysis
      • Long-term Insights Briefings
      • Policy advice themes
        • Engagement
        • Evidence and evaluation
        • Free and frank advice
        • Innovation
        • Policy and law
        • Stewardship
      • Policy community
        • Policy system leadership
        • Policy agencies
        • Policy managers
        • Policy practitioners
        • Ways to connect to the policy community
        • Open government
      • Agency panels and quality reporting
      • Publications
      • Policy community events
    • Government Targets
      • Government Targets Quarterly Reports
    • National security
      • New Zealand's National Security Strategy
        • New Zealand’s national security community
      • National Security Intelligence Priorities
      • Counter-terrorism
        • New Zealand's Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism Strategy
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Fund
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Research
        • Terrorist and National Security Event Media Protocols
      • Countering foreign interference
      • Critical Infrastructure Resilience
      • Cyber Security Strategy
        • Cyber ransom advice
        • United Nations Cybercrime Treaty
          • We asked, you said, we did
      • Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • 2022 Review of the Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • Why did we need new legislation?
        • What is intelligence?
        • Defining national security
        • Bringing the agencies further into the public service
        • Powers and warrants
          • Activities allowed under intelligence warrants
          • The authorisation framework
          • Protections for New Zealanders
        • Strengthening oversight of NZSIS and GCSB
        • Whistleblowing and protecting classified information
        • Cover and immunities
          • Cover and assumed identity arrangements
          • Immunities from legal liabilities
        • Sharing information
          • Domestic information sharing
          • Arrangements with foreign partners
        • The National Assessments Bureau
        • Case studies
          • Counter-terrorism
          • Investigating a suspected terrorist
          • Counter-espionage
          • Cyber security in action
        • Resources
      • Strengthening resilience to disinformation
        • Multi-Stakeholder Group to strengthen resilience to disinformation
        • Fund for community-based initiatives to strengthen Aotearoa’s resilience to disinformation
        • Public Research and Insights into Disinformation
      • National Security Long-term Insights Briefing
        • LTIB Topic Consultation Summary
      • Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain
        • The Government’s Response
        • Working with Communities - get involved
          • Kāpuia - Ministerial Advisory Group Nominations
        • Response Steering Group
        • Response Progress
        • Measuring Success
        • Improving Community Engagement
        • Key Documents
        • Get in touch
      • Five Country Ministerial
    • Other work
      • Chief Science Advisor Forum
      • Severe Weather Events Recovery Review Panel releases
      • Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor archives
        • Archive
          • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2009-2011
          • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2011-2013
          • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2013-2015
          • Professor Sir Peter Gluckman 2015-2018
          • Professor Dame Juliet Gerrard 2018-2021
          • Professor Dame Juliet Gerrard 2021-2024
      • Historical Programmes
        • He Whenua Taurikura
          • He Whenua Taurikura Hui
            • He Whenua Taurikura Hui 2021
            • He Whenua Taurikura Hui 2022
          • Master’s Scholarship
            • Master's Scholarship 2021/2022
            • Master's Scholarship FAQs
          • He Whenua Taurikura Co-Directors
        • Greater Christchurch recovery and regeneration
          • Greater Christchurch Group
            • Roles and responsibilities
              • Disestablishment of CERA
            • External websites
          • The Greater Christchurch Regeneration Act 2016
          • Our regeneration partners
          • Global Settlement Agreement with Christchurch City Council
          • Recovery and regeneration plans
            • Cranford Regeneration Plan
            • Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Regeneration Plan
            • Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan
            • Residential Red Zone Offer Recovery Plan
            • Land Use Recovery Plan
            • Christchurch Central Recovery Plan
          • Section 71 proposals
            • Commercial film or video production facilities in Christchurch – Section 71 Proposal
            • Hagley Oval
            • Lyttelton Commercial Zone Parking
            • Yaldhurst Recreation and Sports Facility
            • Residential Unit Overlay District Plan Changes
            • Redcliffs School relocation
          • Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Project
          • Past Orders in Council
        • COVID-19 Proactive Releases
        • Kāpuia – Ministerial Advisory Group
          • Advice from Kāpuia
          • Kāpuia feedback to agencies
          • Kāpuia Pānui
        • All of Government COVID-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry
        • Child Wellbeing and Poverty Reduction
          • Child Wellbeing and Poverty Reduction Group
          • Child and youth wellbeing strategy
            • Publications and resources
          • Reducing child poverty
            • Formal gazetting of targets for reducing child poverty
        • COVID-19 Group
        • Health Transition Unit
        • Implementation Unit
          • Latest news and updates
        • Inquiry into the EQC
        • Connect Smart
        • Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Learning and Legacy Programme
        • Ministerial Committee on Poverty
        • Flag consideration project
        • Christ Church Cathedral Working Group
        • Tackling methamphetamine
        • CERA website archive
          • CERA corporate information
          • CERA legislation
          • CERA media releases 2011
          • CERA media releases 2012
          • CERA media releases 2013
          • CERA media releases 2014
          • CERA media releases 2015
          • CERA media releases 2016
          • CERA official information
          • CERA public information
          • CERA publications and reports
          • CERA websites
    • Risk and resilience
      • National Risk and Resilience Framework
        • New Zealand's National Risks
        • 2024 National Risks Public Survey Report
        • 2023 National Security Survey Report
        • 2022 National Security Survey Report
      • Building Resilience to Hazards Long-term Insights Briefing
      • The ODESC System during a crisis
        • ODESC
        • Watch Groups
        • Inter-agency Working Groups and Specialist Groups
  • Publications
  • Browse all sections
  • Publications
  • News and notices
  • Annual reports
  • CabGuide
  • Cabinet Manual
  • Contact us
    • How to make an Official Information Act request
      • Tips for requesting information
      • Guidance on how we will respond
  • About DPMC
    • Who we are
    • Our work
    • Our history
    • Careers
  • Our business units
    • Cabinet Office
      • Roles and responsibilities
        • Statutory and formal responsibilities
      • Supporting the work of the Cabinet
        • Cabinet Committees
        • Elections
        • Cabinet Manual
        • History of the Cabinet Manual
      • Ministers and their portfolios
        • Ministerial List
        • Ministerial portfolios
        • Register of Assigned Legislation
        • Delegations
        • Ministers' interests
      • Executive Council
      • The Honours Unit
    • National Security Group
      • National Assessments Bureau
        • Working for the National Assessments Bureau
      • National Security Policy
        • National Cyber Policy Office
    • Risk and Systems Governance Group
      • Strategic Crisis Management Unit
      • National Risk Directorate
      • Governance Directorate
      • Joint Office
    • Policy Advisory Group
      • Roles and responsibilities
    • Delivery Unit
    • Strategy, Governance and Engagement Group
    • Government House
    • Cyclone Recovery Unit
      • Cyclone Recovery Funds and Schemes for people in Affected Regions
      • Publicly released Cyclone Recovery-related documents
  • Departmental agency
    • NEMA
  • Our programmes
    • New Zealand Royal Honours
      • Make a nomination
        • Nominations for Honours
        • New Zealand Royal Honours nomination guidelines
        • Nomination Form and Guide to making Nominations
        • Bravery Award Nominations
        • The New Zealand Antarctic Medal: Nomination Guidelines
      • Honours lists and recipients
        • Honours lists
        • Titles and styles of knights and dames
        • Wearing of insignia
      • The New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Overview of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Forfeiture of Honours
        • History
        • Components of the New Zealand Royal Honours system
        • Order of Wear
        • Rules relating to the acceptance and wearing of Foreign Honours
        • New Zealand Herald of Arms Extraordinary
      • New Zealand Royal Honours Image Gallery
      • New Zealand Royal Honours FAQs
      • Privacy statement
    • The Policy Project
      • About the Policy Project
      • Policy quality
      • Policy skills
        • Development Pathways
      • Policy capability
      • Policy Methods Toolbox
        • Start Right
        • Design thinking
        • Behavioural insights
        • Community engagement
        • Futures thinking
        • Treaty of Waitangi analysis
      • Long-term Insights Briefings
      • Policy advice themes
        • Engagement
        • Evidence and evaluation
        • Free and frank advice
        • Innovation
        • Policy and law
        • Stewardship
      • Policy community
        • Policy system leadership
        • Policy agencies
        • Policy managers
        • Policy practitioners
        • Ways to connect to the policy community
        • Open government
      • Agency panels and quality reporting
      • Publications
      • Policy community events
    • Government Targets
      • Government Targets Quarterly Reports
    • National security
      • New Zealand's National Security Strategy
        • New Zealand’s national security community
      • National Security Intelligence Priorities
      • Counter-terrorism
        • New Zealand's Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism Strategy
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Fund
        • Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Research
        • Terrorist and National Security Event Media Protocols
      • Countering foreign interference
      • Critical Infrastructure Resilience
      • Cyber Security Strategy
        • Cyber ransom advice
        • United Nations Cybercrime Treaty
      • Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • 2022 Review of the Intelligence and Security Act 2017
        • Why did we need new legislation?
        • What is intelligence?
        • Defining national security
        • Bringing the agencies further into the public service
        • Powers and warrants
        • Strengthening oversight of NZSIS and GCSB
        • Whistleblowing and protecting classified information
        • Cover and immunities
        • Sharing information
        • The National Assessments Bureau
        • Case studies
        • Resources
      • Strengthening resilience to disinformation
        • Multi-Stakeholder Group to strengthen resilience to disinformation
        • Fund for community-based initiatives to strengthen Aotearoa’s resilience to disinformation
        • Public Research and Insights into Disinformation
      • National Security Long-term Insights Briefing
        • LTIB Topic Consultation Summary
      • Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain
        • The Government’s Response
        • Working with Communities - get involved
        • Response Steering Group
        • Response Progress
        • Measuring Success
        • Improving Community Engagement
        • Key Documents
        • Get in touch
      • Five Country Ministerial
    • Other work
      • Chief Science Advisor Forum
      • Severe Weather Events Recovery Review Panel releases
      • Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor archives
        • Archive
      • Historical Programmes
        • He Whenua Taurikura
        • Greater Christchurch recovery and regeneration
        • COVID-19 Proactive Releases
        • Kāpuia – Ministerial Advisory Group
        • All of Government COVID-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry
        • Child Wellbeing and Poverty Reduction
        • COVID-19 Group
        • Health Transition Unit
        • Implementation Unit
        • Inquiry into the EQC
        • Connect Smart
        • Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Learning and Legacy Programme
        • Ministerial Committee on Poverty
        • Flag consideration project
        • Christ Church Cathedral Working Group
        • Tackling methamphetamine
        • CERA website archive
    • Risk and resilience
      • National Risk and Resilience Framework
        • New Zealand's National Risks
        • 2024 National Risks Public Survey Report
        • 2023 National Security Survey Report
        • 2022 National Security Survey Report
      • Building Resilience to Hazards Long-term Insights Briefing
      • The ODESC System during a crisis
        • ODESC
        • Watch Groups
        • Inter-agency Working Groups and Specialist Groups
  • Publications
  • Browse all sections
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Cabinet policy paper template
CabGuide

Cabinet policy paper template

Publication type:
CabGuide
Published by:
Cabinet Office
Issue status:
Current
Issue date:
Friday, 28 February 2020
Version note:

This publication is part of the CabGuide.

Additional details
Publication category:
Guidance,
CabGuide
Last updated:
Thursday, 21 March 2024
Copyright:
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

The Cabinet policy paper template is intended as a guide for the preparation of Cabinet policy papers, and outlines the headings and type of information that needs to be included in each section. The actual content and structure of a paper should be adapted as appropriate according to the nature of the issue. For advice on developing policy proposals, take a look at the tools available from the Policy Project.

Use the template policy paper [DOCX 38.77 KB] as a guide to preparing the paper, or refer to the onscreen version below. 

Cabinet policy paper template
DOCX
41.62 KB

Tips for writing Cabinet policy papers

When writing a Cabinet paper, you should keep the 10-page guideline in mind.  Use this guide to make sure that the paper only includes the information necessary to support consideration of the decision that is being sought.  Edit draft papers ruthlessly to keep them succinct and focused.  Supplementary information can be included in appendices if necessary.

Papers should be formatted so that they are clear and easy to read.  We recommend using Times New Roman or Arial fonts in size 12 text, with numbered paragraphs, bold headings, and page numbers.  

This template can be copied and pasted into Microsoft Word as a guide to work from. Note that Cabinet papers are Minister’s papers, so are written from a Minister’s perspective.

To avoid formatting errors when the paper is uploaded to CabNet, authors should use the Microsoft Word document styles included in the downloadable template: ‘CabStandard’ for normal numbered paragraphs, and ‘CabRec’ for individual recommendations. If you wish to change from the default Times New Roman font to Arial, right click on the CabStandard style in the Styles Gallery and select Modify to change the font settings. This will then automatically apply to recommendations in CabRec.

 

Cabinet policy paper template

[Security classification – minimum of In Confidence required]

 

Office of the Minister for x

Chair, Cabinet x Committee

TITLE#

Be concise and specific. Express the title of the paper in as few words as possible (i.e. no more than one line).

Proposal

1. In a sentence or two, outline the purpose of the paper (e.g.  This paper seeks agreement to release a consultation document on the care of older people). If the paper seeks approval of a business case for an investment, please refer to the Treasury's Cabinet paper guidance for business case approvals as additional information is required in relevant sections of this template.  Use bullet points if you are seeking decisions on multiple matters.

Relation to government priorities

2. In a brief paragraph explain whether, and if so how, the proposal relates to the Government’s overall stated priorities.  This should reference specific overarching strategies or plans where relevant (e.g. the commitments in the coalition agreements between the National Party and the New Zealand First and ACT parties, and the Government’s quarterly strategic plans, etc). 

3. Some papers won’t relate to a specific government priority. If this is the case, then state it (e.g.  "This is a routine operational adjustment, that requires Cabinet approval").

Executive Summary

4. If the paper is over four pages long, then an executive summary should be included. The executive summary should be only a few paragraphs which highlight the key decisions sought in the paper.  It’s helpful to start with a three paragraph basic outline: a background or context paragraph, followed by a summary of the decisions sought, and a final paragraph which explains next steps. The whole executive summary should not be longer than a page.

Background

5. This section should include the context for the decision being sought, and briefly outline any past work that has been done related to the proposal, and/or other background relevant to the matter. Include a clear explanation of the issue that is being addressed.

6. Reference any relevant Cabinet decisions that have been taken, including the date the decision was taken, and the reference number from the Cabinet or Cabinet committee minute (e.g.  In May 2019, the Cabinet Business Committee agreed to the development of a consultation document on the care of older people [CBC-19-MIN-0852]).  Note that the reference number that should be used is the one on the minute in which the relevant decision was taken (not the reference of the Cabinet Report of Committee minute in which Cabinet committee decisions are confirmed).

7. Other background information can also be included if it will provide useful context for decision-makers to understand why they’re being asked to take these decisions, but make sure to keep it concise.

Analysis (use subject headings as appropriate)

8. This is the main discussion part of the paper.  It should include enough detail that Ministers unfamiliar with the issue can understand the proposal, but focus on information and argument that supports analysis of the options and recommendations. Use this section to explain the issue, outline main considerations, discuss possible options, explain any risks and suggest mitigation strategies, and set out the recommended course of action.

9. The analysis should reflect robust policy development and consultation processes, be informed by evidence and insights from diverse perspectives, and be analytically sound.

10. To ensure the paper is easy to read and understand you should:

10.1 use subheadings to keep the text focused and tell a clear story;

10.2 define any acronyms or technical terms the first time you use them;

10.3 use comparison tables and numbered lists so that information is visually easy to follow and understand;

10.4 use diagrams to help explain complex processes.

11. The analysis should also take in to account the guidelines agreed by Cabinet for policy-makers to consider the Treaty of Waitangi/Tiriti o Waitangi articles in policy development and implementation. The circular Treaty of Waitangi Guidance for Agencies [CO (19) 5] is a useful tool to help with this. 

Implementation (for relevant papers)

12. This section should be included in papers that involve significant proposals or major projects (e.g. new or complex technology or service delivery arrangements).The implementation section should provide a brief overview of what will be done, how it will be done, who will do it, and when it will be done by.  Summarise the implementation aspects, such as project timelines, key milestones, the responsible agency or group for each stage, and outline monitoring and evaluation plans.  Full, detailed implementation or evaluation plans are not expected to be included, but can be appended if useful to help with understanding of particularly complex projects.

13. Where this section is included, it is a good idea to also include “report-back” recommendations to set clear timelines for progress updates, evaluation, and other relevant matters that decision-makers would need or want to be informed of in relation to the proposal (e.g.  direct the Ministry of Examples to provide a progress update to Cabinet by September 2020).

14. Tables are a useful tool for laying out implementation information clearly and concisely, eg:

Milestone/ActivityTimeframe
Central Secretariat establishedMarch 2025
Appointment process beginsJune 2025
Delivery of pilots starts in ManukauSeptember 2026
First six-monthly progress monitoring report provided to MinisterApril 2027

Cost-of-living Implications

15. This section should be used to summarise the likely impacts this proposal will have on the cost of living. This section is primarily descriptive and seeks to demonstrate that consideration has been given to how this proposal will impact on New Zealanders’ ability to maintain their standard of living. This includes direct or indirect impacts on the cost of everyday expenses, such as housing, food, clothing or transport. It also includes any implications for businesses that are likely to be passed on to the consumer.

16. Any detailed financial implications analysis should be included in the financial implications section.

Financial Implications

17. The financial implications of the proposal should be discussed in this section.  If appropriate, outline the costs and how they will be funded. If there are no financial implications, then state that.  All papers that contain recommendations on expenditure or revenue, or that have financial, fiscal or economic implications, must include this section, and have been referred to the Treasury for comment.  Agencies should manage this consultation.

18. All papers with financial implications now require pre-approval from the Minister of Finance ahead of formal ministerial consultation. This includes papers that are seeking new funding (from the Between-Budget Contingency or as a pre-commitment to operating and capital allowances), but also papers with broader financial implications such as revenue impacts, fiscal impacts in the future arising from a policy decision taken now, and funding transfers being made outside of Cabinet Office circular Proposals with Financial Implications and Financial Authorities [CO (18) 2]. The Treasury has issued guidance to agencies on the requirements associated with this new process. If pre-approval is provided, then this should be stated in the financial implications section of the relevant paper. 

19. The Cabinet Office will not put papers on an agenda that do not have the necessary agreement of the Minister of Finance until the issue is resolved.  Ministers’ offices should manage this consultation.

20. See the CabGuide section on financial implications and recommendations for further guidance about proposals with fiscal implications.

Legislative Implications

21. This section should explain whether legislation (i.e. a regulation or bill) is needed to implement the proposals.  If there are legislative implications, then the Parliamentary Counsel Office must be consulted.

22. There are a few things to think about if proposals are intended to be included in a bill:

22.1 if a bill is required to implement the proposals, then state whether a bill has been given a slot on the Legislation Programme and its priority category (further information about this is on the CabGuide).  This information should also be repeated in a recommendation (e.g.  note that the proposals will be given effect through the Examples Bill, which holds a category four priority on the 2024 Legislation Programme (to be passed by the end of 2024 if possible));

22.2 if a paper proposes a timeline for a bill that is different from the bill's priority category on the Legislation Programme, then the paper should include a recommendation proposing a new priority category (e.g.  agree that the priority category of the Examples Bill, which currently holds a category four priority on the 2024 Legislation Programme (to be passed by the end of 2024 if possible), be changed to a category two (must be passed by the end of 2024));

22.3 if a bill is required to implement the policy and there is no provision in the Legislation Programme for such a bill, then Ministers must make a bid for a priority category at the earliest possible time, and include a recommendation seeking agreement to add the bill to the Legislation Programme. 

23. Make sure to consult the Leader of the House and the Parliamentary Counsel Office on any proposal to add a bill to the Legislation Programme, or to change a bill’s priority category, and record the fact that this has been done in the consultation section of the paper.

24. All Cabinet papers seeking policy approvals for proposals that will result in government bills must also address the issue of whether the proposed Act is to bind the Crown. See the circular Acts Binding the Crown: Procedures for Cabinet Decisions [CO (02) 4]  for more information.

Impact Analysis

Regulatory Impact Statement

25. All policy proposals submitted to Cabinet that involve the potential introduction of new legislation, or changes to or the repeal of existing legislation, are subject to Cabinet’s impact analysis requirements, unless an exemption applies. See the CabGuide page on impact analysis for more information, and a list of exemptions.

26. This section should:

26.1 indicate whether or not the impact analysis requirements apply and whether a Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared and is attached to the Cabinet paper and, if not, the reasons why;

26.2 provide an agency opinion on the quality of the RIS, which should be a statement on whether the reviewer considers that the information and analysis summarised in the RIS meets/partially meets/does not meet the quality assurance criteria, and comment on any issues that have been identified in relation to any of the dimensions of quality set out in the quality assurance guidance.

27. Remember to upload the RIS as a separate attachment in CabNet when lodging the paper.

Climate Implications of Policy Assessment

28. A Climate Implications of Policy Assessment (CIPA) is required for proposals which include decreasing greenhouse gas emissions as a key policy objective, or which are likely to have a direct emission impact at or above 0.5 million tonnes CO2-e within the first 10 years of the proposal period. A CIPA is also required for forestry-related proposals that are likely to have a direct impact on greenhouse gas emissions equal to or above 3 million tonnes of CO2-e within the first 30 years. Contact the CIPA team in Ministry for the Environment (MfE) early if it is expected that proposals will meet this criteria.

29. Relevant papers should include a CIPA subheading as part of the Impact Analysis section. A CIPA disclosure sheet (which can be found on the MfE website) must also be attached to the paper. This section should include:

29.1 a statement on whether a CIPA disclosure sheet is attached;

29.2 a brief summary of the key findings of the analysis; and

29.3 the statement provided by the CIPA team in the MfE on the quality of the information set out in the disclosure.

30. More information about this requirement is in the circular Climate Implications of Policy Assessment Requirements [CO (20) 3].

Population Implications

31. This section should be used to summarise the impacts that proposals are likely to have on population groups, as appropriate to the issue, and any actions that will be taken to address negative impacts. Include data where available to show how many people are likely to be affected (take a look at the Living Standards Framework Dashboard and Indicators Aotearoa New Zealand for some useful data).

32. If the impacts are expected to be significant, then analysis of these should be included as part of the general discussion on the proposal.  The best way to work out if there are significant impacts is to talk to population agencies early in the process, and to use the tools that have been developed by agencies, which can help with making assessments.  Links to the tools are on the CabGuide.

33. The population groups that implications should be assessed for, where relevant, are: Māori (as individuals, iwi, hapū, and whanau), children, seniors, disabled people, women, people who are gender diverse, Pacific peoples, veterans, rural communities, and ethnic communities.  If the proposal is likely to impact on a number of different groups, then a summary table can be helpful, as in the example below. If there are a significant range of population implications, then this information can be appended to the paper, with a note under this section heading that refers to that appendix.

Population groupHow the proposal may affect this group
MāoriAs at August 2019, 69% of children and young people in the care of Oranga Tamariki identified as Māori.  The proposals in this paper focus on improving outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori by setting specific and measurable outcomes, and developing guidelines to support productive strategic partnerships with iwi and Māori organisations. 
WomenWomen are under-represented across all levels of the construction industry.  The plan includes actions to encourage women into the industry and to support them to succeed, such as addressing barriers to work, pre-employment training, transport, and access to child-care.
Disabled peopleMeasures to reduce child poverty are likely to benefit disabled people, given that rates of child poverty are likely to be higher for disabled children, and the children of disabled parents.  Officials are exploring the potential for data improvements to help better understand the relationship between poverty, material hardship, and disability.

 

Human Rights

34. Policy papers that have implications for human rights should include a statement about whether the proposal is in any way inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993.  Either state the nature of any potential inconsistencies identified, or state that there are none.  Note the steps that have been taken to address any issues, and/or include information on any justifications for the infringement of a right or freedom.

35. See the CabGuide section on human rights implications for information on the requirements for considering human rights issues when developing policy.

Use of External Resources

36. This section should be used when external resources such as contractors or consultants are engaged and remunerated, and provide a material contribution to the preparation of the policy advice in the paper. This includes the full policy development process, not only the drafting of this paper.

37. The advice in this section should include an overview of the external resources used (including the number of people engaged and for how long, and the services/input provided), and clear justification for their use.

38. If the Cabinet paper is setting up further work, any requirement for external resources to further develop, implement or deliver this work should also be made clear. 

39. Further advice on the information that should be included in this section is outlined in the CabGuide. Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission guidance, including Public Service Contractor and Consultant Expenditure, and Guidance to Enable State Services Agencies to Consistently Measure and Report their Usage of Contractors and Consultants, outlines the expectations for agencies to measure and report on the use of external resources, and provides some useful definitions that may help to inform the advice in this section. The Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment also provides guidance on the appropriate use of contractors and consultants in procurement processes.

Consultation

40. Cabinet papers should be well consulted across agencies, Ministers, and government parties.  It may be appropriate to also consult with interest groups, and other groups who are likely to be directly impacted by the proposal (e.g.  local government (including regional councils), non-governmental organisations, district health boards, advocacy agencies etc).  See the consultation section on the CabGuide for more advice.

41. List the departments that were consulted.  If a department has raised concerns about the proposal and/or does not agree with the decisions sought in the paper, then include a statement of their views. 

42. If other interest groups outside of central government have been consulted, or will be consulted following decisions being taken, then state this too.

43. If the nature of the paper means that specific consultation is required under an Act, then outline the statutory requirements, describe the consultation undertaken or that is proposed, and comment on anything controversial.

Communications

44. Include a brief statement about how the proposal is expected to be communicated, and who will be responsible (e.g.  The Minister will announce the proposal at a stakeholder event in May 2025).

45. Note that any proposals for government advertising and publicity must comply with the Guidelines for Government Advertising.

Proactive Release

46. All Cabinet and Cabinet committee papers and minutes (other than those considered by the Cabinet Appointments and Honours Committee) must be proactively released within 30 business days of decisions being confirmed by Cabinet, unless there is a good reason not to publish all or part of the material.  In this section, state whether the responsible Minister intends to release the Cabinet paper proactively in whole or in part, or to delay the release beyond 30 business days.  Note that there is no need to include a recommendation noting or seeking agreement to proactive release.  Proactive release is subject to redaction as appropriate under the Official Information Act 1982.  More information about proactive release is in the CabGuide, and the Cabinet Office circular Proactive Release of Cabinet Material: Updated Requirements [CO (23) 4].

Recommendations

47. The recommendations are an important part of the paper. They are what the Minister is proposing that Cabinet agree to. The recommendations form the basis of the minute that will be published following the meeting of a Cabinet committee or Cabinet.  Discussions at the meeting will usually focus on the recommendations.  This means that it’s important that the recommendations are written clearly, in plain English, tell a logical story which moves from a high-level overview to specific matters, and don’t leave any room for doubt about what is being decided.

48. The recommendations should be written so that they can be understood by someone who hasn’t read the paper and knows nothing about the topic.  Focus on the main elements of the proposal, and avoid too many overly specific recommendations about technical or administrative matters.  This means seeking agreement to the direction and main elements of the proposal, not to matters that are specifically operational or detailed, except where there is a risk in not doing so.  If Ministers do need to take reasonably specific and detailed decisions on the elements of a proposal, then it can be helpful to include a recommendation seeking authorisation for the responsible Minister to take further decisions on minor and technical matters in line with the policy decisions agreed by Cabinet.

49. Mirror the headings used in the analysis section of the paper to group the recommendations and make it easier for decision-makers to refer back to advice.

50. Noting recommendations should be used only when necessary to provide detail on: previous decisions, the progress that has been made towards a particular aim of policy development, the implications of taking a certain action, and/or other matters that will help make the recommendations clear when read independently of the paper.

51. Each recommendation must be supported by the information in the paper.  Don’t introduce new material in this section.

52. Financial recommendations must be written in a specific format and provide certain information.  The CabGuide has more information about the requirements.

53. While every effort should be made through consultation to get agreement to the recommendations, if there are genuine differences that can’t be resolved then the options should be clearly laid out so that Ministers can take a final decision (as per the example in recommendation 8 below).

54. Any recommendations seeking approval ‘in principle’ must also explain what the decision is subject to (e.g.  consultation, further work, a report-back).

55. Rescinding recommendations should be used only when it is strictly necessary to cancel or replace a policy or requirement previously agreed by Cabinet.  New policy proposals or administrative requirements do not usually need to do this.  Note that only Cabinet has the authority to rescind previous decisions as all committee decisions are confirmed by Cabinet.  Papers for Cabinet committees should seek agreement for Cabinet to rescind previous decisions, as in the example in paragraph 11.

Example formats for recommendations are:

The Minister for xx recommends that the Committee:

1. note that in December 2023, Cabinet agreed that…  [CAB-23-MIN-0365];

2. agree that…;

3. agree in principle, subject to the report-back referred to in recommendation four, to…;

4. direct the Ministry of Examples to report to the Cabinet Legislation Committee by
1 January 2025 with…;

5. invite the Minister of Examples to…;

6. approve the release of…;

7. authorise the Minister to…;

8. agree to:

EITHER [supported by the Ministry of Examples]

8.1 take a certain action; 

OR [supported by the Treasury]

8.2 take a different action;

9. defer…;

10. decline…;

11. agree to recommend that Cabinet rescind the decision referred to in recommendation one, and instead agree to….

 

Once the Minister has approved the draft Cabinet paper for lodgement for Cabinet or a Cabinet committee, this section should be updated to state ‘Authorised for lodgement

 

Hon Jane Jones

Minister for Examples

 

Appendices

Other information can be attached to Cabinet papers if it is useful but not essential to help Ministers understand proposals, such as consultation documents and overview A3s that provide summaries of the proposal or options. A3s are most useful when they make use of diagrams, tables, or graphs, use colour to group information, and don’t include too much text.  Keep in mind that appendices are part of the paper, and also need to be proactively released.

If the appendix is a document written specifically to be publicly released (such as a consultation or discussion document), then make sure it is written plainly and clearly, and is laid out in a format that is easy to read and understand. Remember that the document will likely be read by people who are not subject matter experts, and so should be accessible for people who may not speak English as their main language, or may have a disability. The accessibility guide Leading the way in accessible information  developed by the Office for Disability Issues includes useful advice on how to do this.

  • Previous
  • Next
Sidebar anchor

Related publications

Cabinet paper templates

CabGuide
10 Jan 2025

Cabinet paper template - international treaty

CabGuide
10 Jan 2025

The Executive Council role in the regulations process

CabGuide
10 Jan 2025

Executive Council advice sheet template ('Goatskin')

CabGuide
9 Jan 2025

Cabinet papers seeking business case approvals

CabGuide
2 Oct 2024

Cabinet paper attachments

CabGuide
17 Sep 2024
View all publications

Content wrapper

Help us improve DPMC

Your feedback is very important in helping us improve the DPMC website.


More menu anchor
Home Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC)
Page url

Toitū carbon reduce ISO 14064-1 organisation

Back to top

About DPMC
  • Who we are
  • Our work
  • Our history
  • Careers
Our business units
  • Cabinet Office
  • National Security Group
  • Risk and Systems Governance Group
  • Policy Advisory Group
  • Delivery Unit
  • Strategy, Governance and Engagement Group
  • Government House
  • Cyclone Recovery Unit
Departmental agency
  • NEMA
Our programmes
  • New Zealand Royal Honours
  • The Policy Project
  • Government Targets
  • National security
  • Other work
  • Risk and resilience
Publications
  • Publications
  • News and notices
  • Annual reports
  • CabGuide
  • Cabinet Manual
  • Contact us
  • Copyright and licensing
  • Privacy
  • About this site
  • Disclaimer
  • Site map

© Copyright Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

New Zealand Government